*What is Space?*

If you hypothesize that space is like matter, that one particle of space is the same as all particles of space,then the very large and very small are not factors that define space.If you take "one atom" of space,and look inside it you may discover that the laws of space as we know them break down, that "quantum space" is apparrant.This quantum space cannot be tied down to any one place at any one time, it is everywhere and eternal.It is infinite, it has no boundaries.Quantum mechanics within atoms of elements,give these properties to the particles inside atoms.They are not.They are properties of the space,(inner space).

3D space and its associated mathematics is an incomplete idea.It additionally says that space has no ending (and time),It admits to the existance of infinity, without explaining it .It is making the assumption that reality is a 3D phenomena and delivering a mathematics and science which is supposedly accurate,based on this.It has it.s head in the sand hoping that the existance of infinity and eternity will go away.It is as near as damn it saying that they do not exist, they are not real.It has no formula or mathematical science that can deal with them.

This shows that space in 3 dimensions is a false idea.Space can only be seen as 4 dimensions.A mathematics that cannot work in 4/5 dimensions must be inadequate, in the same way that physics without quantum science is inadequate.

The idea that 3 dimensional space could define reality came from the belief that matter is a living proof of 3 D reality.But this is no longer the case.It is now known that matter is "quantum" in its nature. that it consists of fields and is not 3 dimensional.It is constructed of higher spacial dimensional "material".

It follows that the formula for everything, the unified field theory, cannot be contained in a 3 dimensional equation, it must include the higher dimensional mathematics.It must explain infinity,time and space in its formula.The universe is not a 3D phenomena,it is a reality in 4 dimensions of space,(or more).

The "truth" wont fit into a box of 3 Dimensions.This idea comes from the idea that the universe is a gigantic box/prison consisting in 3 dimensions.It is infinite.The scientist has evaded the outer truth of infinity in its theoretical physics and mathematics, but cannot disregard infinity in its inner space and quantum physics. Science has been based on the assumption that the nature of reality is a dog kennel.

A mathematician may argue that there are an infinite amount of possible spacial dimensions.I would argue that Life is a biological,cosmic,natural phenomena and has inbuilt a consciousness that can see itself in its environment in 5 dimensions.Four of space,one of time.Life and nature cannot be defined in less than 5 dimensions.(There are many other dimensions).That you cannot have a unified field formula or a theory of everything in less than 5 dimensions.Therefore the formula and knowledge is worthless to the unenlightened person.The assumption is that this science can be used as tool to educate and enlighten people to knowledge.This is similar to the ancient techniques and religions with their occult sciences.It can be seen that no long lasting enlightenment or benefit came from the ancient religions.The knowledge of nature gained from the genome will not change the situation.The new age religion is on shaky ground, as all religions have been.

If you hypothesize that space is like matter, that one particle of space is the same as all particles of space,then the very large and very small are not factors that define space.If you take "one atom" of space,and look inside it you may discover that the laws of space as we know them break down, that "quantum space" is apparrant.This quantum space cannot be tied down to any one place at any one time, it is everywhere and eternal.It is infinite, it has no boundaries.Quantum mechanics within atoms of elements,give these properties to the particles inside atoms.They are not.They are properties of the space,(inner space).

3D space and its associated mathematics is an incomplete idea.It additionally says that space has no ending (and time),It admits to the existance of infinity, without explaining it .It is making the assumption that reality is a 3D phenomena and delivering a mathematics and science which is supposedly accurate,based on this.It has it.s head in the sand hoping that the existance of infinity and eternity will go away.It is as near as damn it saying that they do not exist, they are not real.It has no formula or mathematical science that can deal with them.

This shows that space in 3 dimensions is a false idea.Space can only be seen as 4 dimensions.A mathematics that cannot work in 4/5 dimensions must be inadequate, in the same way that physics without quantum science is inadequate.

The idea that 3 dimensional space could define reality came from the belief that matter is a living proof of 3 D reality.But this is no longer the case.It is now known that matter is "quantum" in its nature. that it consists of fields and is not 3 dimensional.It is constructed of higher spacial dimensional "material".

It follows that the formula for everything, the unified field theory, cannot be contained in a 3 dimensional equation, it must include the higher dimensional mathematics.It must explain infinity,time and space in its formula.The universe is not a 3D phenomena,it is a reality in 4 dimensions of space,(or more).

The "truth" wont fit into a box of 3 Dimensions.This idea comes from the idea that the universe is a gigantic box/prison consisting in 3 dimensions.It is infinite.The scientist has evaded the outer truth of infinity in its theoretical physics and mathematics, but cannot disregard infinity in its inner space and quantum physics. Science has been based on the assumption that the nature of reality is a dog kennel.

A mathematician may argue that there are an infinite amount of possible spacial dimensions.I would argue that Life is a biological,cosmic,natural phenomena and has inbuilt a consciousness that can see itself in its environment in 5 dimensions.Four of space,one of time.Life and nature cannot be defined in less than 5 dimensions.(There are many other dimensions).That you cannot have a unified field formula or a theory of everything in less than 5 dimensions.Therefore the formula and knowledge is worthless to the unenlightened person.The assumption is that this science can be used as tool to educate and enlighten people to knowledge.This is similar to the ancient techniques and religions with their occult sciences.It can be seen that no long lasting enlightenment or benefit came from the ancient religions.The knowledge of nature gained from the genome will not change the situation.The new age religion is on shaky ground, as all religions have been.

*It is beginning to look like the creation,evolution and religion are the big red-herrings of the last 2000 years.*

*A species is locked and built into the ecosystem and is heavilly checked and kept in balance with nature.This ecosystem is the earth and earths nature which doesn't need to gain knowledge and evolve.It already is evolved and enlightened.It is locked into one giant evolved super machine which is a total evolution in itself.The idea of evolving through our light and dark forces of nature towards knowledge came into being after we were removed from the checks and balances of nature.These forces were already built in.*

On then subject of evolving toward knowledge to be come a god,where does this refer to evolving into a new species? According to Darwin species have evolved from other species by natural selection and continue to do so, preseumably, but all of a sudden when referring to mankind, we say this stops and he has reached the peak of his evolution whereby man becomes god.This fundamentally floors the whole argument.

Consider this.Evolution depends on time and is by natural selection according to Darwin.Man,s evolution of 3 million years he says is enough to reach near perfection.So how come life forms that have been evolving for 600 million years like trees and insects arent evolved to an incredibly high level.?It doesn't make sense.Trees and insects should be far more evolved and advanced than us.They certainly will survive as a species where we will not.So I suppose this proves they are far more advanced life form in terms of survival inteligence.What is Darwins reply to that?

The idea that species evolve into other species is not backed up by any evidence.Information contradicts this idea.

On then subject of evolving toward knowledge to be come a god,where does this refer to evolving into a new species? According to Darwin species have evolved from other species by natural selection and continue to do so, preseumably, but all of a sudden when referring to mankind, we say this stops and he has reached the peak of his evolution whereby man becomes god.This fundamentally floors the whole argument.

Consider this.Evolution depends on time and is by natural selection according to Darwin.Man,s evolution of 3 million years he says is enough to reach near perfection.So how come life forms that have been evolving for 600 million years like trees and insects arent evolved to an incredibly high level.?It doesn't make sense.Trees and insects should be far more evolved and advanced than us.They certainly will survive as a species where we will not.So I suppose this proves they are far more advanced life form in terms of survival inteligence.What is Darwins reply to that?

The idea that species evolve into other species is not backed up by any evidence.Information contradicts this idea.

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua0MMXJl3FM&t=334s*

Further to this it has been demonstrated that if you let fall two object of the same mass , one of which is magnatized of a certain polarity,one will fall faster than the other.Therefore it is seen that Gravity is of an electromagnetic nature.

An area 51 S4 scientist dealing with UFO technology for the American government says that the solution to the nature of gravity is in the resonant differential field created between a positron and a electron,(matter and antimatter,do not quite cancel out).Others have pointed it being an effect of entanglement.

So the solution to gravity could easlly be in this above inforamtion.The unified field Theory and the standard model seems to be nearly there.

*Matter exists in in space and time.3Dimensional space.The smallest particle of that matter that can exist is an atom which has mass and size in 3D.The material in the universe is of a 3D dimensional nature.The the universe is infinite.So,does the material in the universe inhabit the realm of infinity.The answer is no because the material is within 3 Dimensions Therefore the material itself defines the Space wherein it exists.Material doesn't define infinite space,(4D space), it defines 3D space.Inner space or the infinite, is not defined by material,or in 3Dimensions.Does material exists in 4 dimensions? The answer is no.But the substance from which material is made, is higher dimensional space.Therefore the infinite creates matter but confines its existance to 3 dimensional nature of space,and to time.Infinity (4D space)is not dependant on time,but 3D is.*

Eternity is a dimension of infinity (space),and by altering this dimension the 4 dimensions of space become 3 dimensional,with the additional dimension of time added.Therfore still consisting of 4 dimensions, but one has been transmuted into time.

Inside the atom, the story changes back again.The 3D space and the time laws beak down again.

Biological life seems to be a mechanism whereby matter can evolve into the higher dimension.matter also seems to be created from a higher spacial dimension.

The question that comes to mind, is life a natural consequence of the evolution of space, or has someone or something hijacked the mechamism to deliver a differrant chemistry to matter ?

The real argument is that reality is many dimensions and who created reality?Who cfeated other dimensions? When we say who created the universe we are really saying, "who created everything?", which means we are really saying who created all these dimensions, such as infinity, eternity and more.

Someone has distracted our sight by pointing to matter as being the nature of reality when this is just a small 3D portion of reality.We are not really saying bwho created the universe , we are saying who created who created the 3D portion of the universe, not the 4D portion.

The 3D aspect and time were created from another spacial dimension.Therefore the universe as we understand it was created from another dimension.

When we are talking about the universe , we are not really talking about the universe,, we are talking about the 3 Dimensional portion of the universe, not the 4 dimensional portion.It seems that this 3D aspect where matter exists, and time,was created from a higher spacial dimension.The universe, as we understand it,was created from another dimension.

Eternity is a dimension of infinity (space),and by altering this dimension the 4 dimensions of space become 3 dimensional,with the additional dimension of time added.Therfore still consisting of 4 dimensions, but one has been transmuted into time.

Inside the atom, the story changes back again.The 3D space and the time laws beak down again.

Biological life seems to be a mechanism whereby matter can evolve into the higher dimension.matter also seems to be created from a higher spacial dimension.

The question that comes to mind, is life a natural consequence of the evolution of space, or has someone or something hijacked the mechamism to deliver a differrant chemistry to matter ?

The real argument is that reality is many dimensions and who created reality?Who cfeated other dimensions? When we say who created the universe we are really saying, "who created everything?", which means we are really saying who created all these dimensions, such as infinity, eternity and more.

Someone has distracted our sight by pointing to matter as being the nature of reality when this is just a small 3D portion of reality.We are not really saying bwho created the universe , we are saying who created who created the 3D portion of the universe, not the 4D portion.

The 3D aspect and time were created from another spacial dimension.Therefore the universe as we understand it was created from another dimension.

When we are talking about the universe , we are not really talking about the universe,, we are talking about the 3 Dimensional portion of the universe, not the 4 dimensional portion.It seems that this 3D aspect where matter exists, and time,was created from a higher spacial dimension.The universe, as we understand it,was created from another dimension.

*The old concepts around Hawkins black hole physics were trying to work out the singularity time/space situation as if the particles/forces were a 3D phenomena , but these particles/ forces are quantum, and they are not subject to 3D space laws. Space concerned is inner space, Infinity, not even a singularity is the correct explanation of the space.So matter under these extreme conditions is condenesd into infinity, once the atom gives way to the force.The fields that are not existing in a 3D space.3D space is not altering infinite space/time (inner), but infinity(inner) can alter 3D space laws and time.*

Gravity is only relavant to the space/time until the atoms is break down to their field componants.Then the other forces are at play instead in inner space, which is not 3D outer space.It is not possible for the weaker forces in the atom to break apart the neutrons and protons strong forces, and it cant be gravity either, because the atom is now in its field componants in inner space or Infinity,( this includes the neutron and proton which are fields, not particles.)

So the whole exercise that has been deliverred into trying to find a mathematical solution is not as it has been represented.

To me it seems that something else is going on with this mix of forces and particles (fields) in Hawkins Black Hole experiment. It might not be correct to say that matter breaks down to a singularity under extreme masses.The ideas of singularities might also be incorrect as an idea in space/time.It doesnt make sense when you look at space in 4

Gravity is only relavant to the space/time until the atoms is break down to their field componants.Then the other forces are at play instead in inner space, which is not 3D outer space.It is not possible for the weaker forces in the atom to break apart the neutrons and protons strong forces, and it cant be gravity either, because the atom is now in its field componants in inner space or Infinity,( this includes the neutron and proton which are fields, not particles.)

So the whole exercise that has been deliverred into trying to find a mathematical solution is not as it has been represented.

To me it seems that something else is going on with this mix of forces and particles (fields) in Hawkins Black Hole experiment. It might not be correct to say that matter breaks down to a singularity under extreme masses.The ideas of singularities might also be incorrect as an idea in space/time.It doesnt make sense when you look at space in 4

*dimensions,unless it is the concept of one dimension.If that is the case somewhere in this equation needs to include two dimensional number, (a straight line singularity !).But they dont mean that when they mention a singularity, they mean a scaling down of 3 dimensional space to the smallest possible imaginary size.This is still a 3D idea, not a one dimensional concept.They have diliverred an imaginary idea of what happens to matter when it is scaled down to its physical limits.I have put a differrent idea on this, as field activity in a different dimension.*

If the extreme forces are creating a situation where matter is being condensed to a differrant space/time as I am saying to infinity or inner space,then its componants will be obeying 4 dimensional (quantum) laws , and could now be located at any time or any place according to probabillity laws,( Heisenbergs uncertainty principal),It make sense to say that the matter is not confined at that singularity neccessarilly, but could be relocated elsewhere.It could mean anywhere in the infinity of space time.( Dissipation at slow rate as is sugested doesnt seem to answer this adequately.)Since so much energy is being used to create this "black hole" destruction,it seems logical that eleswhere the

If the extreme forces are creating a situation where matter is being condensed to a differrant space/time as I am saying to infinity or inner space,then its componants will be obeying 4 dimensional (quantum) laws , and could now be located at any time or any place according to probabillity laws,( Heisenbergs uncertainty principal),It make sense to say that the matter is not confined at that singularity neccessarilly, but could be relocated elsewhere.It could mean anywhere in the infinity of space time.( Dissipation at slow rate as is sugested doesnt seem to answer this adequately.)Since so much energy is being used to create this "black hole" destruction,it seems logical that eleswhere the

*opposite physical oportunity is being paid for where a " recreation" is occurring,the energy being paid back ,equal and opposite reaction.It does look like a natural mechanism for distruction and creation of matter.Perhaps recycling waste material. ?*

It worth a fresh look at this old physics.It could be that we have had some misinformation thrown into the works.I have also heard that the LHC has delivered some misinformation.I would not be sure about this.

Two current ideas to expain gravity that I have heard about are diferrential resulting from electron positron aniahaltion (antimatter/matter collision), and entanlglement.Again it wouldnt be a gravity particle it would be a field or resonant differential of some sort.But even with gravity expalined , it might not deliver from what I have said above.

I am not up to date too much in the world of theoretical physics, but I have seen one of Peter Tongs YouTube lectures recently deliverring the formula for the standard model , with just the inclusion of gravity remaining to complete the big formula.

I believe in the neccessity for a standard model

It worth a fresh look at this old physics.It could be that we have had some misinformation thrown into the works.I have also heard that the LHC has delivered some misinformation.I would not be sure about this.

Two current ideas to expain gravity that I have heard about are diferrential resulting from electron positron aniahaltion (antimatter/matter collision), and entanlglement.Again it wouldnt be a gravity particle it would be a field or resonant differential of some sort.But even with gravity expalined , it might not deliver from what I have said above.

I am not up to date too much in the world of theoretical physics, but I have seen one of Peter Tongs YouTube lectures recently deliverring the formula for the standard model , with just the inclusion of gravity remaining to complete the big formula.

I believe in the neccessity for a standard model

In finite space distance can be calculated in up down or across directions by normal mathematics.But infinity is a space where if you multiply the distance of infinity or add infinite space to another quantity of infinite space you always get the same answer.That answer is simply Infinity.Ten times infinity equals infinity.So the amount off space in all the Infinity calculations is the same.So you could say that all of infinity is the same space.This is not the case in Finite space, where all the space is at a different space,

Therefore Infininite space is a different sort of space to Finite space.

Finite space is outer space.

Infinite space cannot be outer space.There is no outer space mathematics in Infinite space.If Infinite space is not "out there" where is it.?

It is inner space.

Yet if you travel "out there"and keep going into infinity , into the infinite universe,How can you say infinity is not out there?And if infinity is the same bit of space everywhere, everything out there must be the new type of space called infinity.Therefore infinite space is also finite space, which makes these two types of space the same type of space from the point of view of infinity, but not from the point of view of finity.Therefore this fourth dimension of space includes in its nature the other three dimensions of space.

**( Read more...Collapse )**

**Find more****Friends Feed****Shop**

March 20 2018, 06:36

000000

**Infinity versus finity. Eternity.**

In finite space distance can be calculated in up down or across directions by normal mathematics.But infinity is a space where if you multiply the distance of infinity or add infinite space to another quantity of infinite space you always get the same answer.That answer is simply Infinity.Ten times infinity equals infinity.So the amount off space in all the Infinity calculations is the same.So you could say that all of infinity is the same space.This is not the case in Finite space, where all the space is at a different space,

Therefore Infininite space is a different sort of space to Finite space.

Finite space is outer space.

Infinite space cannot be outer space.There is no outer space mathematics in Infinite space.If Infinite space is not "out there" where is it.?

It is inner space.

**( Read more...Collapse )**

Quantum mechanics moves into inner space mechanics.Beyond our three dimensional space/time mathematics.A formula for space and Time is needed. Infinity and Eternity.

I think Hawkins was spot on to say that we needed a new system of mathematics to arrive at the unified field formula.

An Atom may be a particle, but anything smaller is a not within outer space, it is inner space. Another dimension.

This shines a light on the validity of string theories idea of 10 Dimensions.But maybe it is overdoing it a bit.

Entanglement also.

The formula is going need a higher dimension inserted into the equation.

Maybe in its entirety, it would have to e a formula outside the boundaries of our normal scientific equation, or may be it could be condensed down into 4 dimensions.

Note:

It would be logical to look for an upgrade in a natural mathematics system.It would make sense in view of natural dimensions as mentioned in the page below.

https://ham-metaphysics.livejournal.com