*The old concepts around Hawkins black hole physics were trying to work out the singularity time/space situation as if the particles/forces were a 3D phenomena , but these particles/ forces are quantum, and they are not subject to 3D space laws. Space concerned is inner space, Infinity, not even a singularity is the correct explanation of the space.So matter under these extreme conditions is condenesd into infinity, once the atom gives way to the force.The fields that are not existing in a 3D space.3D space is not altering infinite space/time (inner), but infinity(inner) can alter 3D space laws and time.*

Gravity is only relavant to the space/time until the atoms is break down to their field componants.Then the other forces are at play instead in inner space, which is not 3D outer space.It is not possible for the weaker forces in the atom to break apart the neutrons and protons strong forces, and it cant be gravity either, because the atom is now in its field componants in inner space or Infinity,( this includes the neutron and proton which are fields, not particles.)

So the whole exercise that has been deliverred into trying to find a mathematical solution is not as it has been represented.

To me it seems that something else is going on with this mix of forces and particles (fields) in Hawkins Black Hole experiment. It might not be correct to say that matter breaks down to a singularity under extreme masses.The ideas of singularities might also be incorrect as an idea in space/time.It doesnt make sense when you look at space in 4

Gravity is only relavant to the space/time until the atoms is break down to their field componants.Then the other forces are at play instead in inner space, which is not 3D outer space.It is not possible for the weaker forces in the atom to break apart the neutrons and protons strong forces, and it cant be gravity either, because the atom is now in its field componants in inner space or Infinity,( this includes the neutron and proton which are fields, not particles.)

So the whole exercise that has been deliverred into trying to find a mathematical solution is not as it has been represented.

To me it seems that something else is going on with this mix of forces and particles (fields) in Hawkins Black Hole experiment. It might not be correct to say that matter breaks down to a singularity under extreme masses.The ideas of singularities might also be incorrect as an idea in space/time.It doesnt make sense when you look at space in 4

*dimensions,unless it is the concept of one dimension.If that is the case somewhere in this equation needs to include two dimensional number, (a straight line singularity !).But they dont mean that when they mention a singularity, they mean a scaling down of 3 dimensional space to the smallest possible imaginary size.This is still a 3D idea, not a one dimensional concept.They have diliverred an imaginary idea of what happens to matter when it is scaled down to its physical limits.I have put a differrent idea on this, as field activity in a different dimension.*

If the extreme forces are creating a situation where matter is being condensed to a differrant space/time as I am saying to infinity or inner space,then its componants will be obeying 4 dimensional (quantum) laws , and could now be located at any time or any place according to probabillity laws,( Heisenbergs uncertainty principal),It make sense to say that the matter is not confined at that singularity neccessarilly, but could be relocated elsewhere.It could mean anywhere in the infinity of space time.( Dissipation at slow rate as is sugested doesnt seem to answer this adequately.)Since so much energy is being used to create this "black hole" destruction,it seems logical that eleswhere the

If the extreme forces are creating a situation where matter is being condensed to a differrant space/time as I am saying to infinity or inner space,then its componants will be obeying 4 dimensional (quantum) laws , and could now be located at any time or any place according to probabillity laws,( Heisenbergs uncertainty principal),It make sense to say that the matter is not confined at that singularity neccessarilly, but could be relocated elsewhere.It could mean anywhere in the infinity of space time.( Dissipation at slow rate as is sugested doesnt seem to answer this adequately.)Since so much energy is being used to create this "black hole" destruction,it seems logical that eleswhere the

*opposite physical oportunity is being paid for where a " recreation" is occurring,the energy being paid back ,equal and opposite reaction.It does look like a natural mechanism for distruction and creation of matter.Perhaps recycling waste material. ?*

It worth a fresh look at this old physics.It could be that we have had some misinformation thrown into the works.I have also heard that the LHC has delivered some misinformation.I would not be sure about this.

Two current ideas to expain gravity that I have heard about are diferrential resulting from electron positron aniahaltion (antimatter/matter collision), and entanlglement.Again it wouldnt be a gravity particle it would be a field or resonant differential of some sort.But even with gravity expalined , it might not deliver from what I have said above.

I am not up to date too much in the world of theoretical physics, but I have seen one of Peter Tongs YouTube lectures recently deliverring the formula for the standard model , with just the inclusion of gravity remaining to complete the big formula.

I believe in the neccessity for a standard model

It worth a fresh look at this old physics.It could be that we have had some misinformation thrown into the works.I have also heard that the LHC has delivered some misinformation.I would not be sure about this.

Two current ideas to expain gravity that I have heard about are diferrential resulting from electron positron aniahaltion (antimatter/matter collision), and entanlglement.Again it wouldnt be a gravity particle it would be a field or resonant differential of some sort.But even with gravity expalined , it might not deliver from what I have said above.

I am not up to date too much in the world of theoretical physics, but I have seen one of Peter Tongs YouTube lectures recently deliverring the formula for the standard model , with just the inclusion of gravity remaining to complete the big formula.

I believe in the neccessity for a standard model

In finite space distance can be calculated in up down or across directions by normal mathematics.But infinity is a space where if you multiply the distance of infinity or add infinite space to another quantity of infinite space you always get the same answer.That answer is simply Infinity.Ten times infinity equals infinity.So the amount off space in all the Infinity calculations is the same.So you could say that all of infinity is the same space.This is not the case in Finite space, where all the space is at a different space,

Therefore Infininite space is a different sort of space to Finite space.

Finite space is outer space.

Infinite space cannot be outer space.There is no outer space mathematics in Infinite space.If Infinite space is not "out there" where is it.?

It is inner space.

Yet if you travel "out there"and keep going into infinity , into the infinite universe,How can you say infinity is not out there?And if infinity is the same bit of space everywhere, everything out there must be the new type of space called infinity.Therefore infinite space is also finite space, which makes these two types of space the same type of space from the point of view of infinity, but not from the point of view of finity.Therefore this fourth dimension of space includes in its nature the other three dimensions of space.

**( Read more...Collapse )**

**Find more****Friends Feed****Shop**

March 20 2018, 06:36

000000

**Infinity versus finity. Eternity.**

In finite space distance can be calculated in up down or across directions by normal mathematics.But infinity is a space where if you multiply the distance of infinity or add infinite space to another quantity of infinite space you always get the same answer.That answer is simply Infinity.Ten times infinity equals infinity.So the amount off space in all the Infinity calculations is the same.So you could say that all of infinity is the same space.This is not the case in Finite space, where all the space is at a different space,

Therefore Infininite space is a different sort of space to Finite space.

Finite space is outer space.

Infinite space cannot be outer space.There is no outer space mathematics in Infinite space.If Infinite space is not "out there" where is it.?

It is inner space.

**( Read more...Collapse )**

Quantum mechanics moves into inner space mechanics.Beyond our three dimensional space/time mathematics.A formula for space and Time is needed. Infinity and Eternity.

I think Hawkins was spot on to say that we needed a new system of mathematics to arrive at the unified field formula.

An Atom may be a particle, but anything smaller is a not within outer space, it is inner space. Another dimension.

This shines a light on the validity of string theories idea of 10 Dimensions.But maybe it is overdoing it a bit.

Entanglement also.

The formula is going need a higher dimension inserted into the equation.

Maybe in its entirety, it would have to e a formula outside the boundaries of our normal scientific equation, or may be it could be condensed down into 4 dimensions.

Note:

It would be logical to look for an upgrade in a natural mathematics system.It would make sense in view of natural dimensions as mentioned in the page below.

https://ham-metaphysics.livejournal.com

The Higgs boson could have been theorized in our equations without having been verified by the LHC,but the gravity particle could not.It would have been more significant to solve this than it would have been to solve Mass.So what was the LHC really built for ? it is surprising that not more has been done there since 2012.

I think that that not all is being told to us.

It is interesting that David Sereda,an area 51,S4 scientist, states that gravity is not a particle but is the differential between the electron and positron.That these particles do not entirely anniahalate each other , but there is about and 8-10% residual.He works for the government in secret projects involving antigravity and alien technology,a cutting edge expert in this field, so must be taken very seriously.If this is true, the LHC is not telling us something about the truth of matter and anti matter.

This is not straight forward.Read between the lines.

Eric Verlinde is saying that entanglement results in the gravity effect.If you take string theory seriously, then it is self evident that another dimension is at work. Entangle of particles is direct evidence of the 4th spacial dimension.Time and space operate different laws here. This is well known, so why do they not formulate this ? In respect to gravity, string theory can not argue with Verlinde.

It is clear that 4th spacial dimension is interacting in our 3 dimensional space, and time universe, but whether it can introduce a force into the lower dimension is not clear yet.I am hesitant to agree with Eric Verlinde.His ideas on dark matter and energy are more interesting.It could be, though, that entanglement plays a role with gravity, and also the other forces.

**( Read more...Collapse )**

The standard model in Physics is put down here as well as a Dutch Scientist with a radical proposal for the Gravity "particle" and Dark Matter/Energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edvdzh9Pggg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVQfWC_evg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OlEGq_g2FI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE7HSnJd53E

At this link you find a former area 51 scientist discussing advanced technology, and included is the description, briefly, is solution to the gravity force.it seems they have the knowledge to unify the forces and matter?Time/space.They would have this written formula, whataever it is .

The interesting information in this lecture is that the force of gravity is the resonant differential between the Positron and Electron.Very interesting.However it might not assume that the electron is exactly as has been taught to us, so I don't know how this works out on paper.It would be for mathematicians and scientists to look at,

It might be that the idea of the 4 fundemantal forces as delivered to us (gluon, strong and weak and gravity etc),may be revised.

If unified they would be revised anyway, maybe only one force/matter .maybe an anti. "particle".

By the way these are not particles,they are wave forms/energies/strings or something not of a physical construction.The smallest particle that can exist is the atom.After that you go into the quantum world of Time/Space.

Inner Space,or just space , if all space is linked.It takes the lid of the box when you consider more dimensions.

It would have no meaning.Could it manage to expand,to shrink ,to respond to gravitational influensces and fields.?Would it be a lifeform in its own right with time from a beginning to an end? or Forever.? Is space a life form.?Does it have consciousness? Does it replicate itself? ( in its many dimensions).Where does the material come from in our dimension and what is its relation ship to its space?Is it a neccessry part of 3 dimensional space or can 3 dimensional space live without material? Can material live without 3 dimensional space.?

Once you know one particle of time , you know all particles of time.One second can be transmuted into a thousand years and visa versa.The nature of time is like that of space when you move into other dimensions.Past present and future are all here,written into the same moment.Eternity can hit you in a moment.the formula for the entirety of time can come and go in an instant.As is the case for Infinity.Gazing up into the heavens on a clear night ,away from the city pollution will give you direct access to the visabillity of Infinity and Eternity nature of the Universe.The door into the 5th dimension, in a flash, nutshell.Written into nature.It is who you are.It is you.This is the nature of time and space at a higher dimension.As do the physical laws change In the quantum world, so do the laws of Space/Time change at a higher dimension.You can travel into the future or the Past if you can break through the conditioning.Inner time is like inner space.You cannot put a position on it, this time is any time ,anywhere and also at any place.The physical laws of time can be changed in the next dimension.As is the case with space.It is the same idea.We can live at any time at any place, physically if we wanted to, but this is not necessary.Also it is contrary to the higher nature of time. Because time. like space, is already here .The here and the now is time /space anywhere and everywhere.As is the sight of the stars in the clear night sky,the visabillity of the Eternity and Infinity,is here now.

5th dimensiuonal science have built machines that can travel physically into any time and part of space,according to the information available on YouTube whistleblowers.They have the formula for time.

Note:

To this article and the Dimension-Quanta article:

Living beings and ecosystems are natural 5th dimensional machinery with 5th dimensional knowledge built into them.We do not need science and machines.

It is often confusing when discussing the quantum world and standard physical concepts if you talk about quantum mechanics as a physical reality It is not.The smallest particle of matter in our 3 dimensional space, (and 1 of time),is the atom.It has size and mass.In the quantum world we are not talking about the 3 special dimensions, we have entered the world of another Spacial/Time dimension , and therefore it is not surprising that the laws of physics are not the same it seems obvious that we are into inner space.A 4th space dimension.It is therefore ridiculous to talk about sub-atomic particles.They are not particles.They are wave forms and energies.Quantum entanglement between 2 quanta of light photons demonstrate the laws of inner space .Innerspace includes the entirety of outer space, ones spacial position in inner space can be interchanged with any position in the entire outer space realm,(Universe).So as you move into a higher dimension you lose the requirements of obey the rules of the lower dimension.Just as you would not wish to return to living in the world of a straight line on a piece of paper, (2 dimensional world) after living in our 3 spacial dimensional universe , the same would be the case if you were a being who had evolved to live in a 4 dimensional spacial world , and so on , 5 and 6 and 7 dimensional worlds.you would not like living at lower spacial dimensions.

The laws of Time and Space govern the physical world that only exists in our 4 dimensions.The speed of light is supposed to be a constant in our space time , but if you alter the space time , you alter the speed of light and therefore the mass,( which is proportional to the speed of light).therefore space/time determines mass as well.So it can be seen that the physical laws of the universe change in other space/time dimensions.

Spacial dimensions are the nature of reality and it is possible to move freely into any dimension,it is not written that you shall inhabit any particular dimensions.All dimensions at up for grabs if you can step outside the conditioning of your world.

Nature is built up in layers of many dimensions, and mastering the laws of nature in one dimension enables you to move into the next layer of nature and so on.It does not alter you position in space or time do do this. As we can see from innersapce experiments, all points in Space are the same when seen from a higher dimension, This is so with Time as well.

The other side of the universe in terms of inner space is on the same place as where we already are.It is already here,(or there).

So science has taken us into the 5th dimension, and the world has been shaken by this revolution.Quantum science is the science of a higher world.The basis of what people were assuming would be the New Age.We can move freely between these 5 dimensions or any other, theoretically, but first we must master the 4 dimensions we already live in, by our nature.It is necessary in the process of evolution to become a Master of Time and Space,by nature, in each dimension that we move on up to.